Course Content
Evaluation and Exams
Evaluation in hybrid classrooms requires adaptive approaches that respect the diverse needs and settings of students learning both in-person and remotely. Below is a detailed discussion of various methods, their considerations, and the associated risks and benefits.
0/6
Hybrid Examinations
Designing examinations for hybrid settings involves blending online and in-person assessment strategies while ensuring fairness, accessibility, and integrity.
0/3
Certification System
Certification in hybrid classrooms must be designed with fairness, flexibility, and accessibility in mind.
0/3
Self-assessment
23 questions to test your learning level
0/1
Feedback and evaluations in hybrid classrooms

In hybrid settings, evaluation methods must be flexible and inclusive, accommodating different learning contexts. Key approaches include:

  • Formative and Summative Assessments: Formative assessments (like quizzes, discussions, and activities) provide continuous feedback, helping students adjust their learning strategies. Summative assessments (final exams or major projects) evaluate cumulative understanding.
  • Peer Assessment and Self-Assessment: Encouraging students to evaluate their own work or that of peers fosters metacognitive skills, helping them reflect critically on their performance. This approach is effective in both synchronous (live) and asynchronous (recorded or written) formats.
  • Project-Based Assessments: Suitable for hybrid learning, these assessments focus on practical and collaborative work, integrating both in-person and remote students into group projects. This method not only assesses knowledge but also soft skills like teamwork and digital collaboration.
Scroll to Top