Course Content
Evaluation and Exams
Evaluation in hybrid classrooms requires adaptive approaches that respect the diverse needs and settings of students learning both in-person and remotely. Below is a detailed discussion of various methods, their considerations, and the associated risks and benefits.
0/6
Hybrid Examinations
Designing examinations for hybrid settings involves blending online and in-person assessment strategies while ensuring fairness, accessibility, and integrity.
0/3
Certification System
Certification in hybrid classrooms must be designed with fairness, flexibility, and accessibility in mind.
0/3
Self-assessment
23 questions to test your learning level
0/1
Feedback and evaluations in hybrid classrooms

Target Group:

– Hybrid classroom learners (can be adapted for both children and adults).

– Suitable for both in-person and remote students

Duration: 30-45 min

Number of participants: 10 t0 30

 

Resources and materials:

 

Digital platform for virtual collaboration (e.g., Google Docs, Padlet, or an LMS discussion forum) for remote participants.

Sticky notes, markers, or notepads for in-person participants.

Projector and screen for displaying peer work (optional).

Objectives and learning goals:

Expected results:

Teach participants how to give balanced feedback using positive psychology principles.

Develop reflective thinking skills and improve critical analysis abilities.

By the end of the activity, participants should be able to provide constructive feedback that includes both strengths and areas for improvement.

Enhance communication skills and build a supportive learning environment.

  • Participants learn to frame feedback in a positive and constructive manner.
  • Increased student engagement and motivation through strength-based feedback.
  • Development of critical thinking and reflective skills.
  • Strengthening peer relationships and promoting a collaborative classroom environment.

Step to step – HOW TO DO

 

1.        Introduction (5 minutes):

Explain the “Two Stars and a Wish” method. Highlight its basis in positive psychology and its application for effective peer review and feedback.

2.        Demonstration (5-10 minutes):

Demonstrate the technique with a simple example:

Choose a sample work (e.g., a presentation, essay, or project).

Identify two strengths (“stars”) and one constructive suggestion (“wish”) for improvement.

3.        Group Work (15-20 minutes):

In-Person: Divide participants into pairs or small groups. Ask them to exchange their work (e.g., a short written response, project idea, or presentation).

Remote: Use breakout rooms or collaborative tools to pair up participants. They can share their work digitally (e.g., Google Docs).

Each participant gives feedback to their partner using the “Two Stars and a Wish” method. Remind them to focus on providing meaningful and supportive feedback.

4.        Reflection and Discussion (10-15 minutes):

Reconvene as a larger group and invite volunteers to share their experience:

What did they find effective about the feedback they received?

How did focusing on positive aspects first impact their response to the constructive feedback?

For remote learners, use discussion boards or chat features for participants to share their thoughts.

Scroll to Top