Course Content
Evaluation and Exams
Evaluation in hybrid classrooms requires adaptive approaches that respect the diverse needs and settings of students learning both in-person and remotely. Below is a detailed discussion of various methods, their considerations, and the associated risks and benefits.
0/6
Hybrid Examinations
Designing examinations for hybrid settings involves blending online and in-person assessment strategies while ensuring fairness, accessibility, and integrity.
0/3
Certification System
Certification in hybrid classrooms must be designed with fairness, flexibility, and accessibility in mind.
0/3
Self-assessment
23 questions to test your learning level
0/1
Feedback and evaluations in hybrid classrooms

Balancing assignments and exams in hybrid settings requires consideration of both flexibility and rigor:

  • Assignments:
    • Pros: They offer students the flexibility to work at their own pace, especially beneficial for remote learners. Additionally, they allow for a variety of formats such as essays, presentations, and digital portfolios.
    • Cons: Monitoring authenticity and ensuring academic integrity can be challenging, particularly with remote submissions.
  • Exams:
    • Pros: Exams provide a structured and timed environment, useful for assessing students’ knowledge under pressure. This is easier to manage in controlled in-person settings.
    • Cons: For remote learners, exams present logistical challenges, such as varying time zones, technical requirements, and proctoring needs. Ensuring fairness and integrity without bias against remote learners is critical.
Scroll to Top